无论是在2014年世界杯决赛被撞得肩部肿胀，还是在2022年卡塔尔世界杯遭遇不利判罚，他大多只是无奈摊手或默默承受。

津巴布韦：明年禁锂精矿出口！华友唯一工厂：消化不了外来矿料

88550 ★

摘要：尽管梅西所在的俱乐部已与银河就球员的“优先发现权”达成和解，相关指控目前仍在调查之中。

传球成功率86.44%说得过去，但他全赛季682次传球尝试，在队内仅高于因伤长期缺阵的埃斯特旺和拉维亚。

1、人人体育 TCL的赞助策略则更加激进，直接同时签下了西班牙、阿根廷、德国等多支强队，决赛直接变成了"TCL德比"。

面对如此超神的表现，一切赞美之词都显得苍白无力，唯有那句“伟大，无需多言”方能概括这位球王的无上本色。人人体育敖尹背靠反派组织的复杂人设，自带强势、带有征服欲的叙事风格，和当下主流的“大女主”情感认知相悖。

2、@徐州家长，这场报告会，干货满满！

但对手南非下半场少打一人，墨西哥进攻效率仍有提升空间，16次射门仅4次射正。

3、国际禁毒日｜拒绝毒品珍爱生命

绿茵场上的故事似乎正在走向尾声，但很少有人留意到，梅西的另一重身份正在被重新定义。

4、自动驾驶迈入运行安全时代，李骏院士：AI开车车企全责，车辆终身纳入安全监管

一线高校有校友群、有学长内推、有老师直接对接企业；内陆普通院校的学生，连"提前批"三个字可能都是刷社交媒体才第一次听见。

5、米体丨米兰的卖人计划

23-24赛季，镰田大地加盟拉齐奥，38次出场贡献2球2助攻。

这个口子一开，后果是一连串的。

”然而，当我们拨开情绪的迷雾，还原赛场真相时便会发现，这绝非所谓“球霸”的骄横，而是一位39岁老将在高压之下，为全队守住尊严底线的领袖担当。

6、松江新凯社区配套商业项目如何建？这场市民圆桌会让群众“金点子”直达一线

如今主流的乙游运营模式，早已跟不上玩家迭代的价值诉求，商业逻辑、内容创作、玩法体系全面陷入瓶颈。

交锋前瞻与比分预测综合来看，荷兰在硬实力、单兵能力、身体对抗与高空球方面拥有天然优势，日本则在战术成熟度、团队配合、近期状态上占据上风。

7、女子半年暴瘦35公斤险送命！这种网红减肥法不是人人适用→

看着这些画面，重温那段历史，对我们有帮助。

颇具戏剧性的是，去年夏天马竞原本就是哲凯赖什的热门追求者之一，只是瑞典人最终选择了酋长球场。

8、希腊齐达内，当前腰拿联赛金靴，当替补无缘欧洲杯决赛

此次更新只升不降，既奖励了球员们在世界杯上的发挥，也反映了今夏转会市场的最新动态。

作为2018年与2022年的连续两届决赛参与者，他们距离“三星法国”仅一步之遥。

作为该财务策略的一部分，体育部门评估了多名能够通过出售产生资本收益的球员，卡萨多因其青训背景成为最具吸引力的选项之一。

9、马斯克：“把特斯拉只当作汽车公司估值，从根本上就是错的” — 更像十几家科技初创

在这场荡气回肠的逆转之战中，39岁的梅西再次向世界展示了何谓“球王本色”，他不仅用一记助攻双响导演了这场史诗级翻盘，更将自己在本届世界杯的数据定格在8球4助攻、独造12球的恐怖级别。

随着西班牙队史上第二次赢得世界杯，今夏在北美举行的足球盛宴正式落幕。

10、美菲领导人通话涉及南海问题，外交部回应

万达就此成为国际足联顶级全球合作伙伴，和阿迪达斯、可口可乐、VISA平起平坐。

历史上，相隔十六年。

1、阿莫林发布会谈到曼联：抱歉犯错了，接下来的热身赛会相遇

小组赛三场球，南非把这套战术玩到了极致。

2、太凉快！今天，无锡这里都是人！

最终结果就是电芯鼓包、安全阀被冲开、电解液泄漏、铜排腐蚀。

3、4.24意甲推荐：那不勒斯VS克雷莫纳

相比之下，显存容量却仅增长几十倍。本周六起延时开放！洛阳民俗博物馆发布公告从纸面实力来看，两队差距悬殊。

4、总决赛关键得分榜詹姆斯高居第一，但43%的胜率算合格吗？

长鑫Q1营收508亿元，同比增719%。

5、湘潭学子在全国中学生田径锦标赛获佳绩

当然，俱乐部可以临时“挂名”几人充数，但在完全的权力真空中，会很大程度影响到球员的心态。

6、忒PANDA新系列亮相时尚中国之夜

2026年8月，公司计划启动 Pre-IPO 最后一轮融资，目标投前达到了500亿美元。

而如果阿根廷能早早取得进球，埃及就不得不压出来，这样反击的空间就更大，阿根廷的机会反而会更多。

据介绍，该项目背后是曦智科技新一代“dOCS光电混合组网方案”，其机柜间就是以光交换技术连通，据称时延低至百纳秒级，能支持万卡规模集群。

7、超越梅西！姆巴佩22球独享世界杯历史射手王：比起纪录更渴望进决赛

拓竹如果只是把这些数字做得更大，它最终仍会被视为一家效率更高、产品更好、规模更大的硬件公司。

对于新一代魔彩盒平台的产品，客户测试过程出乎意料地顺利，因为这是一次比较大的技术变化，一开始我们也比较谨慎，但客户测试完成后的反馈非常积极。

8、你找对象，看脸还是看智商？最新研究：高智商男性，更长情，对伴侣更忠诚；但女性择偶更看重合不合拍，而非“颜值为王”

弗里克追求战术多变性，类似于巴黎圣日耳曼那种位置可互换的锋线组合，而戈登和阿德耶米都能提供这种特质，同时也擅长跑身后空当。

卡马尔达的另一条路线是继续外租，这也取决于米兰新任主帅和体育总监的态度，目前租借最热门的去向是都灵和蒙扎。

” 在市场判断上，万兴科技更看重AI影视领域的增量市场属性，而非对传统影视制作的替代逻辑。

对比来看，赣锋锂业自给率仅在50%至70%区间，国内多数中小锂盐企业仍需外购锂精矿，唯有天齐锂业可实现完全自给、无需对外采购原料。

夏天衣服不用买贵的，白色T恤才是百搭王者，简约清爽又减龄开局之年看中国丨义乌全球数贸中心里的新气象刚刚，预警连发！7-9级雷暴大风将抵无锡！ “积木之旅”从登上列车开始！全国首列上海乐高乐园主题列车启程

关联文章推荐

加载更多

网站提醒和声明

人人体育而在新赛季，他将不会过多参与俱乐部业务工作，据意大利媒体分析，伊布可能会承担更多的外宣和开拓市场工作。申请删除>> 纠错>> 投诉侵权>> 平台自有内容（文字、图片、界面、榜单、商标、LOGO 等）知识产权归本站所有，未经书面许可，禁止复制、转载、商用。

提交说明：快速提交发布>> 查看提交帮助>> 注册登录>>

赞 81383

踩 96455

最新评论

用户评论34853

请先登录后再发表评论发布

相关推荐

然而积极的业绩面并未阻止股价下行。

三月痛风更容易发？这份高嘌呤王炸榜先收好

92218

俱乐部现在有条件耐心等待一份既符合竞技目标、又能满足财务预期的报价；若这样的机会未能出现，留下这位忠诚的青训产品同样是一个稳妥且合理的选择。[2026]

西班牙运气爆棚？晋级路上对手接连折损大将

91102

马竞不盲目追求超级巨星，而是致力于培养“硬仗型球员”。

甜啦啦牵手黄山毛峰，拓宽消费新赛道

20643

值得一提的是，葡萄牙人最近删除了个人社媒中有关米兰的所有标签，这标志着离队已成定局，不过他所向往的英超尚未有球队给出报价。

被穆里尼奥双杀的孔蒂，将接过蓝衣军团教鞭，并把卢卡库还给对方

33738

Nexfin News — China’s lithium battery industry is undergoing a rite of passage, transitioning from wild expansion to disciplined competition. In the first half of the year, a rare divergence between surging corporate earnings and falling stock prices brought a permanent shift in the sector’s underlying dynamics into sharp focus. By mid-July, A-share lithium battery stocks pulled back despite dramatic midyear earnings forecasts. Tianqi Lithium projected net profit growth of up to 4,935% year-over-year, EVE Energy forecast a 95% to 110% increase, and both Sunwoda and REPT BATTERO turned profitable again. Across the supply chain—from upstream lithium salts to downstream battery makers—most companies reported substantial operational gains. Yet robust earnings failed to stop equity valuations from sliding. On July 8, Chengxin Lithium hit its daily downside limit, Yahua Group dropped over 15%, and Tinci Materials saw more than 30 billion yuan in market value evaporate within a week. Ganfeng Lithium has fallen roughly 38% from its peak, while market leader CATL is down about 20%. The immediate trigger for the selloff was the resumption of operations at CATL’s Jianxiawo lithium mine. On June 29, the mine secured its safety production permit, which was officially posted on the Credit China website on July 7. The site—the world’s largest single lepidolite mine—had been idle for over ten months. With an annual capacity of roughly 100,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate, it previously accounted for 8% to 10% of China’s total output. Its return brings over 45,000 tons of additional supply in the second half of the year, hitting elevated lithium prices head-on. Futures markets reacted instantly: on June 18, as restart speculation grew, the main lithium carbonate contract fell 6.58% in a single session, beginning a steady slide from its May high of 205,000 yuan per ton. This stark contrast between thriving industrial output and falling stock prices coincided on the surface with lithium carbonate pulling back rapidly from its May peak of 200,000 yuan per ton to 151,000 yuan. But a more critical question remains: is this the sign of a cyclical peak, or is the industry undergoing a profound revaluation? Answering that requires stepping back to examine the paradigm shift that unfolded across the lithium battery sector between 2025 and 2026. The essence of this shift is not the fluctuation of any single price signal, but a permanent realignment of the industry's competitive playbook—moving from "who expands the fastest" to "who possesses technology, steady profits, and global compliance capabilities." From 60,000 to 200,000 In late June 2025, battery-grade lithium carbonate dropped below 60,000 yuan per ton, touching a three-year low of 59,900 yuan. Lithium salt producers across the sector incurred heavy losses, forcing widespread shutdowns among small and medium-sized manufacturers. From Australian hard-rock mines and small African projects to domestic lepidolite producers, virtually all marginal capacity went offline that summer. A two-and-a-half-year price slump accomplished its single necessary function: clearing out excess supply. By the fourth quarter of 2025, supply and demand dynamics reversed faster than the market had anticipated. The initial spark came from energy storage demand. Data from research firms including InfoLink show that global energy storage cell shipments reached roughly 610 GWh in 2025, up over 90% year-over-year, with fourth-quarter volumes alone topping 200 GWh. Production schedules showed energy storage cells clearing lithium carbonate inventories at an accelerating quarter-over-quarter pace. As growth in electric vehicle batteries moderated, energy storage stepped in not just to absorb excess capacity, but as the industry's primary growth engine. Surging demand was only half the story; supply contracted just as sharply. Small African mines and high-cost domestic lepidolite operations exited the market. Meanwhile, Zimbabwe announced a temporary suspension of lithium concentrate exports in February—a country that accounted for 15.5% of China’s lithium concentrate imports in 2025. Although Australia remained the primary pillar of China's upstream raw material supply at over 50%, the policy further tightened market expectations surrounding upstream supply. Zimbabwe's Ministry of Mines later confirmed that a formal export ban would take effect in January 2027. The tension between supply and demand peaked with the onset of a structural global deficit. Morgan Stanley estimated in early 2026 that the global market would face a shortfall of roughly 100,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) for the year. Soochow Securities calculated total annual lithium mine supply at approximately 2.14 million tons, representing 440,000 tons of new capacity—most of which was not slated to come online until after the third quarter. That timing gap fueled the price rally during the first half of the year. Driven by these converging forces and inventory restocking across midstream channels, lithium carbonate surged from 70,000 yuan per ton in October 2025 to 200,000 yuan by May 2026. Unlike the speculative frenzy that drove prices to 600,000 yuan in 2022, this recovery occurred after capacity had been fully built out, anchored firmly by real end-user demand. Gaogong Industry Research Institute (GGII) summarized the shift: "This is not a bubble, but a return to fundamental value. The structural surge in energy storage demand, combined with supply-side consolidation, has redefined a rational price band for lithium." Prices doubled quickly due to market sentiment and downstream stockpiling. July’s price correction reflected two main factors: the gradual release of new supply and downstream resistance to inflated raw material costs. Analysts generally expect lithium carbonate to trade within a median range of 120,000 to 160,000 yuan per ton for the full year—a price level that keeps most producers profitable without triggering another round of reckless expansion. Energy Storage as the New Engine In the first half of 2026, China's energy storage battery shipments reached roughly 485 GWh, a year-over-year increase of over 80%. Over the same period, power battery shipments totaled roughly 630 GWh, up over 30%. The gap between the two segments is narrowing rapidly. Structural figures are even more telling. In the first quarter of 2026, Chinese energy storage battery shipments totaled about 209 GWh, up 115% year-over-year and accounting for roughly 40% of total lithium battery shipments. By June, energy storage cells made up nearly 41% of monthly production schedules—up from around 30% a year earlier. According to InfoLink, full-year energy storage cell shipments in 2025 reached roughly 610 GWh, approaching 70% of power battery shipments over the same timeframe. Energy storage is no longer a side business for battery makers; it has emerged as an independent market reshaping demand across the industry. Behind this market realignment lies a fundamental shift in purchasing drivers. Before 2024, domestic energy storage growth was driven primarily by mandatory integration policies, which required wind and solar projects to install storage capacity. That regulatory setup created low-quality demand, leading to poor utilization, weak financial returns, and inconsistent cell quality. Between 2025 and 2026, market dynamics pivoted from regulatory compliance to commercial economics. The shift first materialized in the domestic market. In early 2026, the National Development and Reform Commission and the National Energy Administration jointly issued new capacity pricing regulations (NDRC Pricing [2026] No. 114), establishing a national capacity tariff mechanism for standalone energy storage facilities. Local standards were set between 165 and 330 yuan per kilowatt-year, depending on the province. Surveys by Soochow Securities indicated that internal rates of return (IRR) for storage stations in several provinces crossed the 6% threshold required for commercial viability, especially where peak-to-valley price spreads exceeded 0.3 yuan per kWh. IRRs for top-tier projects reached as high as 10%, fundamentally improving overall demand quality. This domestic turning point coincided with an explosion in international demand. Major solar-plus-storage projects launched across the Middle East, particularly in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, with individual project capacities regularly reaching several gigawatt-hours. In emerging markets across Australia, Southeast Asia, and Africa, weak power grids and rising renewable energy penetration transformed energy storage from an optional luxury into a necessity. Soochow Securities calculated that utility-scale storage installations in emerging markets grew 233% year-over-year in 2025, with an additional 69% increase projected for 2026. In Europe, energy security concerns and green energy quotas kept commercial, industrial, and residential demand robust. GGII projects that global energy storage battery shipments in 2026 will reach 800 to 1,100 GWh, representing year-over-year growth of 30% to 70%. Even at the mid-point estimate of 900 GWh, energy storage output is positioned to approach or match power battery production this year. As the industry's primary growth engine shifts, its core operational requirements are evolving as well. Power battery demand is dominated by automakers, whose priority is cost efficiency. The customer base for energy storage, however, is far more diverse: utility operators prioritize long cycle life and safety, data center owners require high discharge rates and extreme reliability, and overseas projects demand lifecycle compliance and supply-chain traceability. Winning in these markets requires technological adaptation, solid project execution, and international compliance capabilities rather than sheer scale. Oversupply or Industry Maturity? Evaluating battery utilization rates requires a closer look at the underlying numbers. In May 2026, the single-month installation rate for Chinese power batteries dropped to roughly 38%. Over the first five months of the year, cumulative power battery installations totaled 259 GWh against 863 GWh produced—yielding an overall utilization rate of about 30%. Factory output continues to outpace vehicle installations, leaving a substantial share of manufacturing lines underutilized. The five-year trajectory of Chinese power battery installation rates tells a clear story: 70% in 2021, 54% in 2022, roughly 52% in 2023, 50% in 2024, 44% in 2025, and 38% by May 2026. This steady decline in installation rates offers clear evidence of an industry transitioning from rapid early growth into maturity. Yet labeling the sector simply as oversupplied misses crucial nuances. The market is not experiencing a uniform glut; rather, it is undergoing sharp structural polarization. High-end shortages coexist alongside low-end surpluses. Demand for premium batteries with energy densities above 160 Wh/kg—primarily ternary chemistries—rebounded sharply, rising from a 6% market share in 2025 to 11%. Meanwhile, low-end products under 125 Wh/kg have effectively been phased out. Demand has also diverged sharply between commercial and passenger vehicles. Driven by subsidy policies, battery demand for electric heavy trucks and delivery vans surged, with battery consumption for electric cargo vans rising 169% year-over-year. By contrast, electric buses—once the industry's primary market—fell to fifth place. While market leadership remains dynamic, the nature of competitive moats is shifting. CATL and BYD together retain a 68% market share, but second-tier players like Gotion High-tech, EVE Energy, Svolt Energy, and Hithium are making gains. Competition is shifting from pure capacity expansion to technological differentiation and operating margins. From another perspective, declining installation rates are a natural hallmark of industry maturity. As annual growth moderates, a drop in capacity utilization from 70% to 40% is to be expected. While systemic capacity pressures continue to weigh on industry-wide profitability, and smaller players face ongoing price competition, market leaders retain the balance sheet strength to navigate the transition. As top-line growth slows, manufacturers lacking proprietary technology, accumulated capital, or global compliance infrastructure risk being squeezed out. This shift explains recent strategic course corrections by major capital allocators. Anode producer Sinomatech canceled a 10.3 billion yuan expansion, cathode supplier Dynanonic abandoned a 10 billion yuan project, and separator manufacturer Semcorp terminated a roughly 2 billion yuan facility in Malaysia. Top-tier players reining in massive investments is a classic sign of an industry transitioning from early expansion to financial discipline. This reallocation of capital does not mean expansion has halted entirely. In the first half of 2026, manufacturers announced over 65 new planned projects representing more than 1,500 GWh of capacity and over 220 billion yuan in total investment. Hunan Yuneng disclosed a 24 billion yuan expansion, while Yahua Group announced additional capacity in Zimbabwe. Expansion continues, but the prerequisites have changed: only enterprises with strong technical barriers, cash reserves, and global compliance infrastructure are positioned to invest while competitors scale back. Technology Race 2.0: Three Fronts If the period between 2022 and 2024 was defined by a race for manufacturing scale, 2025 and 2026 have marked a pivot toward technological differentiation across three distinct fronts. Front One: Structural Shortages in 314Ah Cells The central operational focus for the energy storage supply chain in 2026 has been a structural shortage of 314Ah cells rather than short-term price swings in raw lithium. By March, average spot prices for 314Ah cells from tier-one manufacturers approached 0.40 yuan per Wh, with small-lot orders reaching 0.45 yuan per Wh—a surge of over 25% within six months compared to the 0.30 to 0.34 yuan per Wh seen in August 2025. The immediate driver was rising raw lithium costs—at 180,000 yuan per ton of lithium carbonate, theoretical cell production costs sit between 0.35 and 0.38 yuan per Wh. However, the root cause was a supply gap during the industry's transition to larger formats. As manufacturers shift from 280Ah and 314Ah form factors toward 500Ah+ designs, investment in legacy 314Ah production lines has largely ceased. Because next-generation 500Ah+ cell capacity will not scale up until late 2026, production ramps and customer testing created a temporary bottleneck. During this supply gap, the deficit widened significantly, pushing delivery timelines for select orders into 2027. This dynamic reflects a clear shift in industry economics: market returns are no longer guaranteed simply by bringing capacity online, but by executing format transitions ahead of competitors. CATL has already deployed its 587Ah cell in a 2.4 GWh standalone storage project in Inner Mongolia, while EVE Energy has accelerated mass production of its 628Ah format. With the shift toward larger cell formats underway, manufacturing execution is everything. While 314Ah supply constraints present an immediate operational challenge, solid-state technology represents the long-term competitive battlefield. Front Two: A Return to Realism in Solid-State Batteries Although 2026 has been touted as the inaugural year for commercial solid-state battery deployment, that label requires qualification: current production consists almost entirely of semi-solid (hybrid liquid-solid) chemistries. Models including the NIO ET9, MG4, GAC Hyper, and Chery vehicles have entered the market equipped with semi-solid packs featuring energy densities between 350 and 400 Wh/kg. Because these designs remain compatible with over 90% of existing liquid battery production lines, retooling costs remain manageable and rollout schedules are accelerating. However, the commercial reality of all-solid-state technology remains far more complex than vehicle showroom specifications suggest. In March 2026, Ouyang Minggao, an academician at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, offered a candid assessment: "To be prudent, it is best not to commercialize all-solid-state battery vehicles over the next two years." He cited three major technical hurdles: solid-solid interface stability, where microscopic gaps between solid electrolytes and electrodes cause internal resistance to spike; lithium dendrite formation and safety risks; and the environmental volatility of sulfide electrolytes, which decompose upon exposure to moisture and demand strict manufacturing conditions. Industry leaders report steady if measured progress. CATL’s sulfide-based solid-state cell has surpassed an energy density of 500 Wh/kg, with small-scale production anticipated in 2027. BYD’s 20 GWh facility in Chongqing is scheduled to begin semi-solid production in the third quarter of 2026, targeting pilot runs for all-solid-state cells in 2027. Gotion High-tech plans to initiate operations on a 2 GWh solid-state line by late 2026, while EVE Energy has produced sample 60Ah solid-state cells. A clear timeline has taken shape: 2026 is focused on pilot line verification, 2027 on vehicle testing, and 2030 on potential large-scale commercialization. The implementation of recommended national standard GB/T 43568-2026 (Solid-State Batteries for Electric Vehicles) on July 1, 2026, established an initial regulatory framework for long-term development. Ultimately, 2026 marks less the mass adoption of solid-state technology than a recalibration of market expectations. Meanwhile, an underappreciated demand driver is quietly gathering momentum. Front Three: AIDC Storage as AI Infrastructure In the first five months of 2026, global energy storage shipments for AI data centers (AIDC) reached 10 GWh, surpassing total volume for all of 2025. Industry research firms project that global AIDC storage demand will reach 300 to 400 GWh by 2030—more than twenty times its 2025 level. Capital deployment in the segment is ramping up. CATL invested roughly 4.1 billion yuan to acquire a strategic stake in Senter Power to secure positioning in high-voltage DC power distribution for data centers, while winning a bid for a 2 GW / 4 GWh storage project at a computing center in Guizhou. Fluence signed agreements covering a 12 GW pipeline of potential projects with two major U.S. cloud providers, LG secured eight data center storage contracts totaling 6 GWh—including projects for Oracle—and Panasonic announced 350 billion yen in battery investment aimed at tripling its data center storage revenue. The expansion of AIDC storage is driven by a widening gap between AI computing power demands and utility grid capacity. Power consumption per rack in modern AI facilities has jumped from 5–8 kW in traditional data centers to 40–100 kW, while grid connection approvals and capacity upgrades often take three to five years. Onsite battery systems serve both as backup power and as a bridge to accelerate facility commissioning. Energy storage is moving from an auxiliary fallback to an integrated structural component of data centers. Following NVIDIA’s October 2025 announcement of an 800V DC power architecture—designed to phase out diesel generators and legacy uninterruptible power supplies (UPS)—storage systems are being wired directly into primary distribution networks. This shift expands the market beyond traditional buyers like power utilities and renewable energy developers to encompass cloud providers and infrastructure operators, establishing a distinct category of demand. Globalization 2.0 While domestic market consolidation marks the industry’s initial transition to maturity, international expansion presents a secondary test. Tariff structures, raw material access, and regulatory standards are tightening concurrently across major export markets. Trade barriers represent the most immediate hurdle. The European Union’s countervailing duties on Chinese battery electric vehicles have been in effect for five years and are expanding to include plug-in hybrids. In the United States, the Inflation Reduction Act continues to raise domestic content requirements for power and energy storage batteries. Concurrently, China has reduced its export tax rebates for batteries from 9% to 6% as of April 2026, with complete elimination scheduled for January 2027. Rising trade costs are accelerating a shift from direct product exports to localized overseas manufacturing. At the same time, competition over raw materials is intensifying. The U.S.-led Minerals Security Partnership continues work to build key mineral supply chains outside China, while changing rules in jurisdictions like Zimbabwe highlight shifting export policies. Strategic positioning across raw material supply chains remains an ongoing operational priority. Regulatory compliance presents a quieter but more complex technical hurdle. The European Union’s Battery Passport regulations will become mandatory on February 18, 2027, requiring detailed disclosure of lifecycle carbon footprints, material origins, and recycled content percentages. The impact of these rules depends heavily on how accounting frameworks are defined; systematic discrepancies in baseline emissions databases regarding Chinese energy mixes or manufacturing processes could affect market access. In response, leading Chinese manufacturers are moving from passive compliance to active engagement with international standards. CATL has partnered with BMW and Germany’s Catena-X network to help establish over 90 baseline carbon accounting metrics. BYD invested over 100 million yuan to develop its "i-Carbon Chain" platform for digital carbon tracking across its supply chain. Similarly, REPT BATTERO collaborated with TÜV Rheinland and Circulor on a battery passport initiative, securing third-party verification for 98 independent datasets from an EU Notified Body. Overseas manufacturing footprints are expanding in tandem: CATL’s production complex in Hungary, BYD’s plant in Brazil, Gotion High-tech’s joint venture in the United States, and Envision AESC’s gigafactory in Spain. Chinese battery makers are transitioning from a model of centralized domestic production for export toward localized manufacturing aligned with international standards. This next phase of international expansion hinges on regulatory transparency, supply chain control, and deep local integration. Beyond Maturity In July 2026, as equity valuations diverged from corporate earnings across the lithium sector, market participants wrestled with where the industry stands in its broader evolution. The most visible change is the shift in growth drivers. With energy storage shipments reaching 485 GWh in the first half of the year to account for over 40% of total output, the gap between storage and mobility applications is closing rapidly. This demand-side pivot coincides with capacity rebalancing on the supply side, where power battery installation rates have adjusted from 70% down to the 30%–40% range, signaling an end to early, unbridled expansion while overall margins remain under pressure. These structural shifts are redefining entry barriers across the market. With 314Ah cell prices rising over 25% in six months and AIDC storage demand expanding rapidly, technical capabilities are increasingly determining market positioning. As national standards for solid-state technology take effect and EU Battery Passport deadlines approach, regulatory compliance has become a baseline operational requirement. The trajectory of lithium carbonate—falling to 60,000 yuan, rebounding to 200,000, and settling near 150,000—reflects a market seeking equilibrium. This broader transition was highlighted by a joint policy announcement on July 18, when three Chinese government ministries introduced a new consumption tax structure for batteries. Effective September 1, lithium-ion batteries are subject to a 2% consumption tax, rising to 4% in September 2027, while sodium-ion and solid-state batteries remain exempt through the end of 2028. The policy ends a tax exemption for lithium batteries that spanned more than a decade. Phasing in taxation uses fiscal policy to encourage capacity optimization and technological upgrading by taxing established chemistries while incentivizing next-generation alternatives. For second-tier cell makers operating on narrow margins, the 2% tax burden—equivalent to roughly 0.007 to 0.008 yuan per Wh—will further compress operating margins, reinforcing market consolidation around capitalized leaders. For China's lithium battery industry, 2026 represents a clear inflection point. Enterprises equipped with proprietary technology, international compliance frameworks, and established brand equity face a broader global landscape as the sector matures. Conversely, manufacturers reliant on single customers, lacking technical moats, or unable to meet evolving compliance standards face mounting pressure. The early expansion phase of the lithium battery industry has drawn to a close. Its mature chapter is just beginning. (This article was first published on the TMTPost App. Author | AGI-Signal, Editor | Zhao Hongyu)梅西走下世界杯赛场，变身硅谷投资人。

传球+三分投篮之外，火箭新秀化身防守端万金油！顶替奥科吉，进轮换有戏

15080

别搞错了，人们都在谈论赖斯，不，不是他——哈里·凯恩之后，英格兰的队长就该是贝林厄姆。

最后一舞！C罗：2026是我最后一届世界杯会尽情享受

57456

能够鲜明展现IP性格，并和粉丝直接互动，贯穿全天、各种各样的「明星朋友」演艺互动是IP「动」起来的最主要载体。

一场5-0，让法布雷加斯豪取5连胜！意甲最新积分榜：2-4名仅差6分

32392

马竞决意不给西甲的两大对手任何助力，但如果是卖给一家英超俱乐部，他们的抗拒心理恐怕会少很多。

株洲天桥特种机器人研究院成立

61506

而在这场失利的漩涡中心，除了凯恩自身的挣扎，英格兰主帅图赫尔的战术安排，更是成为了外界口诛笔伐的焦点。

这件背心太火了！今年流行的高智风、老钱风、复古风都离不开它

11264

所以，就算国产设备参数达标，客户也倾向于用长期验证过的海外产品。

省委常委会召开会议，研究进一步做好防风险保安全护稳定各项工作

41680

加载更多